Volume 6 Issue 16, August 13, 2019
A state's certificate of need (CON) status cannot be controlled by the owners of an ASC, but it is an important factor in a transaction and can have a significant impact on the type of buyer interested in an investment opportunity.
ASCs operating in a CON state are often attractive to buyers as the surgery centers' owners have already overcome a significant obstacle to development: the securing of the CON. This is a requirement that those individuals interested in opening new ASCs will need to address.
Buyers in today's market are increasingly less interested in taking on the risk of purchasing ASCs with a majority or significant portion of patients receiving out-of-network services. Insurance companies have been pushing back against providers that bill for out-of-network care, which is increasing the risk level for collecting on out-of-network claims. When providers attempt to bill for procedures performed on out-of-network patients, payors are often finding ways to delay reimbursement or outright rejecting claims.
When a facility is in-network, buyers gain the ability to model future cash flows with more accuracy. Developing these models adds a layer of predictability and alleviates future risk related to the acquisition.
In summary, a healthy mix, with the majority of the patient census as in-network beneficiaries, is more conducive to a better valuation.
In a parallel domain to the previous point, patient network status directly impacts an ASC's payor mix. This payor mix can weigh heavily on the outcome of a valuation and sale. Well-negotiated commercial contracts can lead to higher reimbursements from payors, which should subsequently lead to higher revenues. Government insurance contracts (Medicare, Medicaid) cannot be negotiated and thus provide ASCs with a fixed, pre-determined payment. A heavily dependent volume of governmental insurance can compress valuation and limit the pool of buyers. Unfortunately, it is often difficult to alter one's payor mix to compensate for greater commercial patients. However, having a good understanding of contracts and payor mix can help identify which buyers could be targeted.
In summary, a healthy payor mix, with a majority of patients covered by commercial payors, can prevent valuation issues and keep more buyers interested in the investment opportunity.
Not all specialties are created equal concerning valuation. More specifically, this concerns those specialties receiving varying degrees of reimbursement rates compared to other specialties. One example would be the difference in reimbursement from specialties like orthopedics, spine, and ophthalmology compared to pain management, general surgery, and gastroenterology. The former tends to benefit from higher valuations due to better reimbursement trends.
In summary, specialty type will have an impact on valuation expectations. It is not something that can be easily remedied on its own. But the next point may help alleviate some of the accompanied valuation issues that come inherent with focusing in a specialty.
Along the same vein as the previous point, but worth carving out separately, is identifying an ASC's focus as a single- or multi-specialty facility. Similar to the industry concentration point identified in the introduction, ASCs are tied to their own version of industry concentration. Their ability to offer multiple specialties allows for greater valuation due to be less susceptibility of perceived industry risks.
Risks such as those associated with reimbursement can shift substantially. Specialized ASCs are more prone to experiencing significant financial impact if such shifts occur and they cannot hedge away from potential downward spirals.
In summary, the ability offer multiple specialties in an ASC can mitigate against industry risks, regulatory risks, and reimbursement risks and can therefore increase valuation expectations.
When ASC owners call VERTESS seeking guidance concerning selling their business, oftentimes they are the sole owner and operating physician in their facility. The immediate question following introductions concerns whether an exit strategy has been formulated. The answer to this question tends to associate with an enormous disparity in valuation. The lack of an implemented exit strategy can decimate valuation to the salvage value of the assets in the building. This is compared to an owner with a well-constructed exit strategy who might realize a significant valuation for their planning.
An absent succession plan is not unique to ASC owners but is rather a general oversight for many business owners. It can become especially problematic for an ASC with a single physician owner because the volume of that facility is entirely dependent upon that individual, with a departure of the physician halting the future volume of the business.
In summary, ASCs with just one or only a few owners who plan on exiting the business should gain an understanding of the impact of their exit on the future of the facility. Proper preparations should be made years in advance to better realize valuation goals.
While healthcare shares many qualities with other industries, it is unique in numerous and very significant ways. Within healthcare, ASCs have many of their own unique qualities. VERTESS focuses on healthcare because we understand what is similar, what is different, and what these similarities and differences mean to attracting buyers and securing a fair price for your business.